MADE IN PROJECT OFFICE ABUJA CONCEPT NOTE
PROJECT TITLE: Made in Nigeria Special Project.
National Strategies for Homegrown Economic Promotion, Innovation, Sustainable Growth, Entrepreneurship, and Brand Development Programs.
“Nigeria First Policy:” Transforming Nigeria from a resource dependent nation into a vibrant hub of production-oriented manufacturing, turning our population into a production nation – industralise Nigeria.
Promoting local enterprise thus fostering a culture of self-belief, boosting national pride by instilling confidence in Made in Nigeria goods, products and services.
To enhance the production, visibility, and consumption of made in Nigeria goods, services and brands.
The office of the National Secretariat will be established in Abuja under the supervision of the Permanent Secretary of Political and Economic Affairs in the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF), with the following responsibilities;
Six Regional Offices will be established in North Central, North West, North East, South West, South South, and South East. The Regional Offices will report to the National Secretariat. The regional offices will be responsible for:
iii. State Offices
Each state will establish its own State Project offices in collaboration with the State Governments to coordinate the project activities at the State level under the supervision of the National Office.
The Project will be implemented by the Made in Nigeria Project Office, Abuja, and will be overseen by the office of the Permanent Secretary, Political and Economic Affairs in the OSGF.
Detailed Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Framework specifically tailored for the Made in Nigeria Project Office, designed to help track performance, assess progress, and guide decision-making:
S/N | Goal | Promote sustainable economic growth through increased patronage of locally made goods and services. |
1 | ||
2 | Objectives | i. Increase awareness and patronage of Nigerian made products. ii. Support local manufacturers through capacity building and market access. iii. Improve the quality and competitiveness of local products. iv. Facilitate policy advocacy and Public Private Partnerships |
S/N | Objective | Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) |
1 | ||
2 | Awareness | Percentage increase in social media engagement |
3 | Number of media campaigns conducted
| |
4 | Public perception index (survey based) | |
5 | Number of local manufacturers trained or the percentage increase local industries revenue | |
6 | Percentage of Government procurement from local producers | |
| Percentage of local products onboarded on e-commerce platforms (MAiNPro Mart) |
Quality Improvement
| Indicators |
Number of certifications acquired by local products
| Product quality audit reports
|
Consumer satisfaction rate (conduct consumer surveys) | |
Policy & Partnerships | |
Number of policy dialogues held | |
Number of MOUs signed with key stakeholders | |
Percentage of Government procurement from local producers
|
S/N | Method | Purpose |
1 | Surveys (Online/Physical) | Assess consumer perception, satisfaction, and awareness |
2 | Focus Group Discussions | Gain qualitative insights from stakeholders |
3 | Administrative Records | Track programme inputs and outputs |
4 | Partner Reports | Document implementation progress from collaborators |
5 | Observations | Site visits, product fairs, and field checks |
S/N | Activity | Frequency | Responsible Party |
1 | Data Collection | Monthly/Quarterly | M&E Officer and Programme Leads |
2 | KPI Analysis | Quarterly | M&E Unit |
3 | Progress Report | Biannually | Project Director |
S/N | Type | When | Purpose |
1 | Baseline Evaluation | At inception | Establish benchmarks |
2 | Mid-Term Evaluation | Midway through the project | Review performance, re-strategise |
3 | Endline Evaluation | At completion | Assess outcomes and impact |
4 | Impact Evaluation | Post-project (1–2 years after) | Determine long-term effects |
S/N | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
1 | Low stakeholder buy-in | Consistent engagement and communication strategy |
2 | Inaccurate data reporting | Capacity-building for data collection teams |
3 | Policy inconsistency | Advocacy and alignment with government priorities |
iii. Overhead Costs:
Detailed budget and costing for the Special Project will be submitted subsequently.
S/N | Key Stakeholders | Responsibilities |
1 | OSGF | Overall supervision and policy alignment |
2 | State Governments | Collaboration and support |
3 | Nigerian Governors Forum | Collaboration and partnership |
4 | MDAs | As may be relevant |
5 | Private Sector | Investment and product innovation |
6 | Development Partners | Technical assistance and funding support
|
Names of the 5-man Inter-ministerial Technical Committee set up to develop a detailed Project Framework for the Made in Nigeria Special Project.
S/N | Name | Designation | Organization |
1 | Hon. George B. Nwabueze | NPC | MAINPRO |
2 | Dr. Bassey B. Unaowo | SA, PS | PEAO |
3 | Dr. Hajara Njidda Amoni | Director (Administration) | MAINPRO |
4 | Ngozi John-Uyah | Director (Projects and Operations) | MAINPRO |
5 | Mrs. Ekene Okoroma | Director (Monitoring and Evaluation) | MAINPRO |
Expanded Technical Committee
S/N | Name | Designation | Organisation | Remarks/Sign |
1 | Hon. George B. Nwabueze | NPC | MAINPRO |
|
2 | Dr. Bassey B. Unaowo | SA, PS | PEAO (OSGF) |
|
3 | Joseph Ojone Omachonu | Rep. COS to the SGF | OSGF |
|
4 | Abiodun Johnson Ajulo | Representative of SSO | SSO (OSGF) |
|
5 | Dr. Hajara Njidda Amoni | Director (Administration) | MAINPRO |
|
6 | Ngozi John-Uyah | Director (Projects and Operations) | MAINPRO |
|
| Mrs. Ekene Okoroma | Director (Monitoring and Evaluation) | MAINPRO |
|
Prepared by the Made in Nigeria Project Office Technical Committee on Wednesday, May 14, 2025